CCATClinical Analysis Tool
‹ Knowledge base

Browse the corpus

Walk the evidence base by book and chapter — the raw source passages that ground Ask, Differential, and the rest.

1 passage

abstractpubmed· Abstract 2021· item PMID:32703779

Pirfenidone plus inhaled N-acetylcysteine for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomised trial. BACKGROUND: A randomised controlled trial in Japan showed that inhaled N-acetylcysteine monotherapy stabilised serial decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) in some patients with early idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). However, the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with an antifibrotic agent and inhaled N-acetylcysteine are unknown. METHODS: This 48-week, randomised, open-label, multicentre phase 3 trial compared the efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with pirfenidone plus inhaled N-acetylcysteine 352.4 mg twice daily with the results for pirfenidone alone in patients with IPF. The primary end-point was annual rate of decline in FVC. Exploratory efficacy measurements included serial change in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO) and 6-min walk distance (6MWD), progression-free survival (PFS), incidence of acute exacerbation, and tolerability. RESULTS: 81 patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive pirfenidone plus inhaled N-acetylcysteine (n=41) or pirfenidone (n=40). The 48-week rate of change in FVC was -300 mL and -123 mL, respectively (difference -178 mL, 95% CI -324--31 mL; p=0.018). Serial change in D LCO, 6MWD, PFS and incidence of acute exacerbation did not significantly differ between the two groups. The incidence of adverse events (n=19 (55.9%) for pirfenidone plus N-acetylcysteine; n=18 (50%) for pirfenidone alone) was similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Combination treatment with inhaled N-acetylcysteine and pirfenidone is likely to result in worse outcomes for IPF.