Browse the corpus

Family Adverse Experiences and Psychotropic Polypharmacy Among US Youth: 2009-2015. OBJECTIVE: To determine if adverse family factors are associated with a higher likelihood of psychotropic polypharmacy among US youth with a mental health condition. METHODS: The 2009-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data were used to identify family characteristics of 5136 youth aged ≤18 years with an emotional or behavioral health condition. Family adversity was based on family size, number of parents in the household, parental education and income, and parent-reported physical and/or cognitive or mental health disability. Cluster analysis identified family adversity subgroups. Polypharmacy was defined as 3 or more psychotropic classes (eg, stimulants, antipsychotics, antidepressants, mood stabilizers, and sedatives) in at least 1 interview round in a calendar year. Weighted logistic regression evaluated associations between family adversity and psychotropic polypharmacy among youth. RESULTS: Nearly half (47.8%) of youth lived with parents who had a disability. Parents in the least socioeconomically disadvantaged cluster mainly had a mental illness, and 94% of parents in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged cluster had a parent-reported physical and/or cognitive disability and mental illness. Among youth, mood disorder (24.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.6%-16.0%), antidepressant use (16.0%; 95% CI: 10.6%-21.5%), and antipsychotic use (7.5%; 95% CI: 5.4%-9.6%) were higher in the most socioeconomically disadvantaged cluster relative to the other clusters. Approximately 3% of youth received psychotropic polypharmacy. The odds of psychotropic polypharmacy were 2.7 (95% CI: 1.1-6.4) times greater among youth in the most relative to the least socioeconomically disadvantaged cluster. CONCLUSIONS: Higher use of psychotropic polypharmacy among youth with parents who have multiple disabilities raises concerns about oversight and monitoring of complex psychotropic treatment.