Browse the corpus
Walk the evidence base by book and chapter — the raw source passages that ground Ask, Differential, and the rest.
30 passages
INTRODUCTION Phosphorus is an essential mineral that plays a key role in cell signaling and bone metabolism. The consumption of phosphorus has risen steadily in the United States over past decades and now considerably exceeds the recommended daily intake in men and women, and across all age groups.(1, 2) The increase in dietary phosphorus has been driven, in part, by greater consumption of phosphorus-containing food additives, from which intake alone has nearly doubled over the past decade.(1, 3) Estimating the phosphorus content of such additives is difficult; hence, the size of the increase may be underestimated.(4) Despite tight hormonal regulation of phosphorus balance, excess dietary phosphorus may adversely impact cardiac structure and function. In controlled feeding studies of healthy volunteers, dietary phosphorus loading stimulates the phosphaturic hormone fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) and lowers circulating concentrations of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D.(5–7) Lower vitamin D and higher FGF-23 concentrations are associated with left ventricular hypertrophy in experimental models and clinical studies.(8–11) Dietary phosphorus loading also acutely impairs flow-mediated vascular dilatation in healthy men.(12) Although serum phosphorus concentrations are generally protected from fluctuations in dietary phosphorus intake, higher serum phosphorus concentrations are associated with greater left ventricular mass (LVM), clinical heart failure, and cardiovascular events in general population studies.(13, 14)
on in healthy men.(12) Although serum phosphorus concentrations are generally protected from fluctuations in dietary phosphorus intake, higher serum phosphorus concentrations are associated with greater left ventricular mass (LVM), clinical heart failure, and cardiovascular events in general population studies.(13, 14) Given plausible effects of dietary phosphorus on ventricular mass, we evaluated associations of dietary phosphorus consumption with LVM, assessed by gold-standard, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, among 4.494 participants in a community-based, multi-ethnic study population that was free of known cardiovascular disease. RESULTS Compared to the 2,320 participants who were excluded due to non-completion of cardiac MRI, missing FFQ, or implausible dietary data, the 4,494 included participants were, on average, younger (61.6 versus 63.2 years), had lower systolic blood pressures (125 versus 129 mm Hg), and were more likely to be White (40.5% versus 35.1%) or Asian (13.9% versus 7.3%).
were excluded due to non-completion of cardiac MRI, missing FFQ, or implausible dietary data, the 4,494 included participants were, on average, younger (61.6 versus 63.2 years), had lower systolic blood pressures (125 versus 129 mm Hg), and were more likely to be White (40.5% versus 35.1%) or Asian (13.9% versus 7.3%). Overall, men consumed more dietary phosphorus than women (mean 1,167 mg/d; IQR 746–1,435 versus 1,017 mg/d; IQR 634–1,261 mg/d). Subjects who consumed more dietary phosphorus tended to be younger, consumed more alcohol, were more likely to be White or Hispanic, exercised more, and had greater body mass index and lower systolic blood pressures (Table 1). Estimated dietary phosphorus was highly correlated with total kilocalories (Pearson correlation coefficient [PCC] = 0.86), and with dietary protein (PCC = 0.83), and dietary sodium (PCC = 0.61). There was no meaningful relationship between estimated dietary phosphorus intake and the serum phosphorus concentrations among the subset of 947 participants who had serum phosphorus measurements available (Table 1; correlation coefficient −0.055).
and with dietary protein (PCC = 0.83), and dietary sodium (PCC = 0.61). There was no meaningful relationship between estimated dietary phosphorus intake and the serum phosphorus concentrations among the subset of 947 participants who had serum phosphorus measurements available (Table 1; correlation coefficient −0.055). The mean and standard deviation LVM for men and women were 168.6 ±36.8 grams and 123.8 ±27.4 grams, respectively. Higher estimated dietary phosphorus intake was associated with greater left ventricular mass (Figure 1 and Table 2). After adjusting for height, weight, age, and race, and weighing model estimates by sex, each 20% greater estimated dietary phosphorus intake was associated with an estimated 0.42 g greater LVM (95% CI 0.14 g, 0.70 g). Progressive adjustment strengthened the association of estimated dietary phosphorus with LVM (Table 2). In the fully adjusted model, each 20% greater estimated dietary phosphorus was associated with an estimated 1.06 g greater LVM (95% CI: 0.50 g, 1.62 g; p-value <0.001). Each 20% greater estimated dietary phosphorus consumption was also associated with a higher mass-to-volume ratio (0.006 g/mL; p-value =0.02), but not left ventricular end diastolic volume or stroke volume in fully adjusted models. Other characteristics that were most strongly associated with LVM include African American race, current smoking, greater body mass, higher systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, and greater urine albumin to creatinine ratio (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2).
e or stroke volume in fully adjusted models. Other characteristics that were most strongly associated with LVM include African American race, current smoking, greater body mass, higher systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, and greater urine albumin to creatinine ratio (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2). When analyzed according to sex-specific quintiles, higher categories of estimated dietary phosphorus were associated with greater LVM (Table 3). After full adjustment, individuals in the highest sex-specific dietary phosphorus quintile had an estimated 6.2 gram greater LVM (95% CI 2.5, 9.8) compared to those in the lowest quintile. This estimate was comparable to other known LVM risk factors: in the fully adjusted model, each 10-mm Hg greater systolic blood pressure was associated with an estimated 2.7 gram greater LVM (95% CI 2.3 g, 3.1 g), and current smoking was associated with an adjusted 8.4 gram greater LVM (95% CI 6.0g, 10.7g). In contrast, neither total caloric intake nor dietary sodium was associated with LVM.
adjusted model, each 10-mm Hg greater systolic blood pressure was associated with an estimated 2.7 gram greater LVM (95% CI 2.3 g, 3.1 g), and current smoking was associated with an adjusted 8.4 gram greater LVM (95% CI 6.0g, 10.7g). In contrast, neither total caloric intake nor dietary sodium was associated with LVM. The magnitude of the association between estimated dietary phosphorus and LVM tended to be stronger among women compared to men, particularly for women who were post-menopausal, and for participants who had chronic kidney disease (Table 4); however, these contrasts were not statistically different (all p-values for interaction >0.2). There were too few cases of advanced kidney disease in MESA to permit testing for interaction across the full range of kidney dysfunction. The size of the association between estimated dietary phosphorus and LVM also did not differ appreciably across categories of age, race/ethnicity, or hypertension status. The prevalence of LVH among male and female MESA participants was 7.7% and 9.2%, respectively. Greater estimated dietary phosphorus consumption was associated with progressively higher adjusted odds of LVH among women, but not men (Figure 2). We investigated whether the association of estimated dietary phosphorus with LVM might differ across different foods groups (Table 5; Supplemental Table 3). Our findings did not reveal any significant differences in the primary association according to the type of dietary protein or processed food status.
The prevalence of LVH among male and female MESA participants was 7.7% and 9.2%, respectively. Greater estimated dietary phosphorus consumption was associated with progressively higher adjusted odds of LVH among women, but not men (Figure 2). We investigated whether the association of estimated dietary phosphorus with LVM might differ across different foods groups (Table 5; Supplemental Table 3). Our findings did not reveal any significant differences in the primary association according to the type of dietary protein or processed food status. DISCUSSION In a community-based, multi-ethnic population without clinical cardiovascular disease, higher estimated dietary phosphorus consumption was associated with greater left ventricular mass, measured by cardiac MRI. Associations persisted after adjustment for known LVH risk factors. Higher estimated dietary phosphorus intake was also associated with a greater odds of LVH among women, but not men. If confirmed in other populations these findings suggest the possibility that dietary phosphorus could have adverse cardiovascular consequences in the general population.
tment for known LVH risk factors. Higher estimated dietary phosphorus intake was also associated with a greater odds of LVH among women, but not men. If confirmed in other populations these findings suggest the possibility that dietary phosphorus could have adverse cardiovascular consequences in the general population. An association of dietary phosphorus with left ventricular mass is supported by the hormonal response to dietary phosphorus. In animal models, and some human feeding studies, dietary phosphorus loading stimulates a rise in fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23) and a decline in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25-OH2D).(5, 6, 15) These hormonal changes serve to maintain phosphorus homeostasis: FGF-23 enhances phosphorus excretion through the kidneys and diminished vitamin D activation slows phosphorus absorption through the gut. However, higher FGF-23 and lower 1,25-OH2D concentrations may have adverse effects on the myocardium. Vitamin D potently suppresses the renin-angiotensin system; disruption of the vitamin D system leads to hypertension and LVH in experimental models.(9) In human studies, higher FGF-23 concentrations are associated with greater LVM.(10, 16) While a dietary phosphorus-hormone-LVM hypothesis is intriguing, this theory awaits further study.
suppresses the renin-angiotensin system; disruption of the vitamin D system leads to hypertension and LVH in experimental models.(9) In human studies, higher FGF-23 concentrations are associated with greater LVM.(10, 16) While a dietary phosphorus-hormone-LVM hypothesis is intriguing, this theory awaits further study. Given previous associations of serum phosphorus concentrations with LVM, incident heart failure, and cardiovascular events(13, 14) it is tempting to connect associations for dietary phosphorus through serum phosphorus levels. However, animal models and human studies demonstrate extraordinarily tight regulation of the circulating phosphorus concentration, irrespective of dietary phosphorus intake.(17, 18) Among 15,513 participants in the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, no association of dietary phosphorus intake with the circulating phosphorus concentration was found across a wide range of phosphorus intake.(19) Associations of estimated dietary phosphorus with LVM were modestly stronger among women and among participants who had CKD. A possible explanation for sex-specific differences could be a reduction in phosphorus excretion that occurs in post-menopausal women.(20) CKD leads to diminished phosphorus clearance through the kidney, which could enhance relationships of dietary phosphorus intake with adverse outcomes. These sub-group findings require confirmation in other study populations, particularly those that include greater numbers of individuals who have CKD.
opausal women.(20) CKD leads to diminished phosphorus clearance through the kidney, which could enhance relationships of dietary phosphorus intake with adverse outcomes. These sub-group findings require confirmation in other study populations, particularly those that include greater numbers of individuals who have CKD. Most participants in this study consumed more phosphorus than the 700 mg/day recommended by the Institute of Medicine.(2) Currently, there are no FDA requirements to list the phosphorus content of food products. In addition, standard nutritional software may not account for phosphorus derived from food additives.(4) These factors likely contribute to significant underestimation of dietary phosphorus content in research studies. More rigorous methods are needed to increase precision of dietary phosphorus assessment, potentially validated against repeated 24-hour urine phosphorus collections, which provide a reasonable estimate of total dietary phosphorus intake in the steady state.(6)
timation of dietary phosphorus content in research studies. More rigorous methods are needed to increase precision of dietary phosphorus assessment, potentially validated against repeated 24-hour urine phosphorus collections, which provide a reasonable estimate of total dietary phosphorus intake in the steady state.(6) An important limitation of our study is potential misclassification of dietary phosphorus consumption using the food frequency questionnaire and NDSR software. This problem is compounded by the increasing use of phosphorus containing additives that are not included in food labels and are therefore missed by current nutritional software.(21) It is likely that such measurement error would occur to a similar degree among participants who had higher versus lower LVM, thereby biasing our results toward the null. A second limitation is the potential for residual confounding, such that individuals who consumed more estimated dietary phosphorus also possessed other characteristics that were linked with LVM, for example consumption of other unhealthy foods or an unhealthy lifestyle. We attempted to address confounding by adjusting for demographics, total calories, dietary sodium, lifestyle factors, and co-morbidities that included established LVH risk factors in a well-characterized cohort; however, confounding remains an important limitation. A third limitation is the cross-sectional study design, obscuring the temporal sequence by which estimated phosphorus intake might influence LVM.
sodium, lifestyle factors, and co-morbidities that included established LVH risk factors in a well-characterized cohort; however, confounding remains an important limitation. A third limitation is the cross-sectional study design, obscuring the temporal sequence by which estimated phosphorus intake might influence LVM. Our study also has some important strengths. Associations were observed in a community-based, multi-ethnic study population, thereby enhancing external validity. LVM was measured using cardiac MRI, which is considered the gold standard for this characteristic.(22) The use of the modified Block FFQ, used in our data collection, has been reproduced and validated in other studies.(23, 24) The study population was free of known cardiovascular disease and analyses were adjusted for well-characterized LVM risk factors, nutritional indices, and lifestyle factors. In summary, we observed associations of higher estimated dietary phosphorus with greater LVM in a multi-ethnic study population. Important next steps include replication of findings in other study populations, improved dietary phosphorus measurement, and further elucidation of possible mechanisms by which dietary phosphorus might impact LVM.
associations of higher estimated dietary phosphorus with greater LVM in a multi-ethnic study population. Important next steps include replication of findings in other study populations, improved dietary phosphorus measurement, and further elucidation of possible mechanisms by which dietary phosphorus might impact LVM. METHODS Study Population The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) was designed to investigate the prevalence, correlates, and progression of subclinical cardiovascular disease among 6,814 men and women aged 45–84 years.(25) Participants were recruited from study sites in Baltimore, MD; Chicago, Ill; St. Paul, MN; Forsyth County, NC; New York, NY; and Los Angeles CA between 2000 and 2002. An informational brochure was mailed to households in targeted areas, households were contacted by telephone, and questionnaires were administered in English, Spanish, Cantonese, or Mandarin to introduce the study and collect eligibility information. The MESA recruited a final study population that was 41% White, 26% African-American, 21% Hispanic, and 12% Asian (primarily Chinese descent). Individuals were excluded from MESA if they had any previous diagnosis of cardiovascular disease, defined by physician-diagnosed heart attack, angina, stroke, transient ischemic attack, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, use of nitroglycerin, or prior angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft, valve replacement, pacemaker or defibrillator implantation, or any surgery on the heart or arteries. All participants gave informed consent and Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for each site.
k, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, use of nitroglycerin, or prior angioplasty, coronary artery bypass graft, valve replacement, pacemaker or defibrillator implantation, or any surgery on the heart or arteries. All participants gave informed consent and Institutional Review Board approval was obtained for each site. For this cross-sectional study, we excluded participants who did not complete the food frequency questionnaire (n=577) or did not undergo cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; n=1,621). Reasons for not completing cardiac MRI were ineligibility (n=477; usually due to metallic fragment, implant, or device), inability (n=954; usually due to claustrophobia), refusal (n=204), mechanical problems with the scanner (n=27), or unknown (n=68).(26) We also excluded individuals who provided implausible dietary information, defined by total daily caloric intake <600 kcal/day (n=112) or ≥6,000 kcal/day (n=10) based on prior published studies,(27) resulting in a final sample size of 4,494. Ascertainment of Dietary Phosphorus Each participant’s usual diet during the previous year was assessed at baseline using a 120-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) developed using the validated Block format.(23) The FFQ was adapted from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study instrument, in which comparable validity was observed for Whites, African-Americans, and Hispanic persons. It was modified to include foods typically eaten by Chinese persons. This questionnaire has been reproduced and validated in a separate study.(24)
FFQ was adapted from the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study instrument, in which comparable validity was observed for Whites, African-Americans, and Hispanic persons. It was modified to include foods typically eaten by Chinese persons. This questionnaire has been reproduced and validated in a separate study.(24) Data from food-specific portions were converted to approximate daily intake amounts of micronutrients in food using the Nutrition Data Systems for Research database (NDSR; Nutrition Coordinating Center (NCC), University of Minnesota).(28) The phosphorus content of each food item was calculated by multiplying the food content in 100 grams of that food item by the serving size (grams) and frequency of consumption (servings/day). To investigate whether potential associations of dietary phosphorus with LVM were dependent on particular foods, we classified each of the 120 food items into 8 groups based on the type of dietary protein (animal, dairy, vegetable, or non-protein) and processed food status (processed versus non-processed). Our study nutritionist (A.K.) created these specific phosphorus food group categories based on National Kidney Foundation’s Nutrition and Diet recommendations for phosphorus intake.(29) The protein and processed food classification scheme for each of the 120-food items is presented in supplemental table 1. To investigate whether dietary phosphorus intake might be related to the serum phosphorus concentration we obtained serum phosphorus measurements that were performed previously among a subset of 947 participants who were included in this study. In a separate validation study of 38 healthy individuals, the correlation coefficient (r) of dietary phosphorus, estimated by FFQ, with 24-hour urine phosphorus was 0.389.(30)
ion we obtained serum phosphorus measurements that were performed previously among a subset of 947 participants who were included in this study. In a separate validation study of 38 healthy individuals, the correlation coefficient (r) of dietary phosphorus, estimated by FFQ, with 24-hour urine phosphorus was 0.389.(30) Ascertainment of Left Ventricular Mass and Indices of Cardiac Structure and Function Cardiac MRI was performed using MRI scanners with 1.5-Tesla magnets. All MRI images were read centrally by readers who were blinded to all study information. A 4-element, phased-array surface coil was placed anteriorly and posteriorly, and electrocardiogram gating and brachial artery blood pressure monitoring were used for all imaging. Left ventricular cine images were produced with a time resolution <50 milliseconds. The intra-class correlation coefficient for LVM was 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96–0.98) meaning that approximately 3% of the total variability was attributed to reader measurement error.(26) Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was defined by a LVM index (LVM indexed to body surface area) greater than 85.3 g/m2 for women or greater than 107.8 g/m2 for men, which corresponds to sex-specific 95th percentile scores among MESA participants without diabetes or hypertension.(31)
ed to reader measurement error.(26) Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) was defined by a LVM index (LVM indexed to body surface area) greater than 85.3 g/m2 for women or greater than 107.8 g/m2 for men, which corresponds to sex-specific 95th percentile scores among MESA participants without diabetes or hypertension.(31) We also assessed left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) and stroke volume. These indices were calculated from MRI data using commercially available software (MASS 4.2, MEDIS, Leiden, The Netherlands).(32) The ratio of LVM to LVEDV (mass-to-volume ratio) was calculated as LVM divided by LVEDV. Ascertainment of Other Study Data MESA investigators ascertained medical histories, including cardiovascular risk factors using standardized questionnaires and determined medication use by the inventory method.(25) Investigators assessed physical activity levels using a survey that queried work, leisure, volunteer, sporting, conditioning, and walking and yard activities. We classified the highest level of education achieved as high school or less, some college, or college or higher. We categorized smoking status as none, current, or former, and we categorized alcohol use as none, 0–7 drinks per week, and >7 drinks per week. We defined diabetes status based on American Diabetic Association 2003 fasting criteria.(33)
l of education achieved as high school or less, some college, or college or higher. We categorized smoking status as none, current, or former, and we categorized alcohol use as none, 0–7 drinks per week, and >7 drinks per week. We defined diabetes status based on American Diabetic Association 2003 fasting criteria.(33) MESA investigators measured height and weight during the physical examination period. After a 5-minute rest, MESA study coordinators measured seated blood pressure three times in the right arm at 1-minute intervals using a Dinamap model Pro 100 automated sphygmomanometer (Critikon, Tampa, FL). The average of the last two measurements was used for analysis. Serum levels of creatinine, urine microalbumin, and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured from blood specimens collected during the MESA baseline examination; serum creatinine measurements were calibrated to the IDMS standard.(34) We defined chronic kidney disease as a glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease formula.(35) We categorized the urine albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR) as <30 versus ≥30 mg/g. Statistical Analyses We evaluated estimated dietary phosphorus intake (mg/day) as a continuous variable and using sex-specific quintiles, given considerable differences in phosphorus consumption between men and women. We log transformed continuous dietary phosphorus due to the approximate log-linear association with LVM. Since LVM was normally distributed in the MESA population we did not transform this outcome variable.
and using sex-specific quintiles, given considerable differences in phosphorus consumption between men and women. We log transformed continuous dietary phosphorus due to the approximate log-linear association with LVM. Since LVM was normally distributed in the MESA population we did not transform this outcome variable. Given known dependence of LVM on height, weight, age, and race,(36) all analyses of LVM included adjustment for these covariates, plus an additional square-root term for weight to best model its relationship with LVM. Given substantial differences in estimated dietary phosphorus consumption and LVM between men and women, and potential interactions of sex with other model covariates (particularly weight), we performed analyses separately among men and women, and when appropriate, report combined point estimates using inverse-variance weighting, which assigns a weighted score based on the standard errors of the coefficients.
n and women, and potential interactions of sex with other model covariates (particularly weight), we performed analyses separately among men and women, and when appropriate, report combined point estimates using inverse-variance weighting, which assigns a weighted score based on the standard errors of the coefficients. We utilized progressive nested linear regression models to estimate cross-sectional associations of estimated dietary phosphorus with LVM after adjustment for relevant confounders. A basic model included height (continuous, meters), weight and weight0.5 (continuous, kilograms), age (continuous, years), and race/ethnicity (White/Black/Asian/Hispanic). A second model added total caloric intake (log-linear, kcal/day), to account for overall differences in energy intake, and dietary sodium (log-linear, mg/day). A third model added smoking (never, former, current), alcohol consumption (none, 0–7, and >7 drinks per day), education (high school or less, some college, college or higher), and amount of moderate-vigorous physical activity (continuous, MET-minutes/week). A fourth model added prevalent diabetes (normal, impaired fasting glucose, diabetes), systolic blood pressure (continuous, mm Hg), use of anti-hypertensive medications, estimated glomerular filtration rate (continuous, mL/min/1.73 m2), urine albumin to creatinine ratio (log-linear, mg/dL), and CRP (log-linear, mg/dL). We also utilized these nested models to determine adjusted associations of estimated dietary phosphorus with LVEDV, stroke volume, and mass-to-volume ratio.
medications, estimated glomerular filtration rate (continuous, mL/min/1.73 m2), urine albumin to creatinine ratio (log-linear, mg/dL), and CRP (log-linear, mg/dL). We also utilized these nested models to determine adjusted associations of estimated dietary phosphorus with LVEDV, stroke volume, and mass-to-volume ratio. We utilized logistic regression with robust variance estimation(37) to estimate the association of dietary phosphorus with the odds of LVH (yes versus no) after adjustment for covariate sets described above. Because LVH is indexed to body surface area, we excluded height and weight from the logistic regression models. In a first sub-analysis we estimated associations of dietary phosphorus with LVM across categories of age, race, sex, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease status. In a second sub-analysis, we evaluated associations between estimated dietary phosphorus within a set of 8 a-priori defined, mutually exclusive food group categories and LVM. All analyses were conducted using STATA version 11.1 (StataCorp., College Station, TX). Values were considered statistically significant at the two-sided alpha 0.05 level. Supplementary Material This research was supported by contracts N01-HC-95159 - N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95169, R01-HL-071739 and R01-HL-072403 from the NHLBI. The authors thank the investigators, staff, and participants of the MESA study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org. Grant support: National Institutes of Health R01 HL096875-01 DISCLOSURES
Supplementary Material This research was supported by contracts N01-HC-95159 - N01-HC-95166, N01-HC-95169, R01-HL-071739 and R01-HL-072403 from the NHLBI. The authors thank the investigators, staff, and participants of the MESA study for their valuable contributions. A full list of participating MESA investigators and institutions can be found at http://www.mesa-nhlbi.org. Grant support: National Institutes of Health R01 HL096875-01 DISCLOSURES The authors report no conflict of interest related to this manuscript. Figure 1 Functional association of left ventricular mass with estimated dietary phosphorus In the upper panel, solid and dashed lines depict mean and 95% confidence intervals for left ventricular mass, respectively, by the amount of dietary phosphorus intake. Values were obtained from an unadjusted fractional polynomial linear regression model that included 99% of the study data (dietary phosphorus values <3162 mg/day). In the lower panel, the frequency histogram depicts the distribution of dietary phosphorus consumption across the MESA study population.
phosphorus intake. Values were obtained from an unadjusted fractional polynomial linear regression model that included 99% of the study data (dietary phosphorus values <3162 mg/day). In the lower panel, the frequency histogram depicts the distribution of dietary phosphorus consumption across the MESA study population. Figure 2 Adjusted association of sex-specific dietary phosphorus quintile with left ventricular hypertrophy in men and women The Y-axis depicts the adjusted the odds ratio of left ventricular hypertrophy for men (squares) and women (circles) according to sex-specific quintiles of dietary phosphorus intake. 95% confidence intervals are presented as gray vertical spikes. Separate logistic regression models for men and women are adjusted for age, race, height, weight and weight0.5, total dietary calories, dietary sodium, smoking, alcohol use, education, moderate-vigorous physical activity, diabetes status, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The unadjusted prevalences of left ventricular hypertrophy for men and women are presented below the figure. Table 1 Baseline characteristics by sex-specific dietary phosphorus quintile.† Dietary phosphorus quintile Q1 (N=898) Q2 (N=898) Q3 (N=900) Q4 (N=898) Q5 (N=898) Estimated dietary phosphorus (mg/day) men 270–687 688–917 918–1166 1167–1553 1554–5032 Estimated dietary phosphorus (mg/day) women 251–585 586–775 776–1009 1010–1345 1346–4069
Table 1 Baseline characteristics by sex-specific dietary phosphorus quintile.† Dietary phosphorus quintile Q1 (N=898) Q2 (N=898) Q3 (N=900) Q4 (N=898) Q5 (N=898) Estimated dietary phosphorus (mg/day) men 270–687 688–917 918–1166 1167–1553 1554–5032 Estimated dietary phosphorus (mg/day) women 251–585 586–775 776–1009 1010–1345 1346–4069 Age 63.2 ± 10.2 62.1 ± 10.1 61.8 ± 9.9 60.7 ± 10.2 60.1 ± 9.9 Male 433 (48) 433 (48) 434 (48) 433 (48) 434 (48) Race White 244 (27) 342 (38) 405 (45) 418 (47) 411 (46) Black 242 (27) 218 (24) 227 (25) 208 (23) 179 (20) Hispanic 181 (20) 173 (19) 166 (18) 199 (22) 258 (29) Asian 231 (26) 165 (18) 102 (11) 73 (8) 52 (6) Diabetes status Normal 523 (58) 535 (60) 564 (63) 539 (60) 556 (62) Impaired glucose 248 (28) 251 (28) 223 (25) 244 (27) 230 (26) Diabetes 125 (14) 108 (12) 110 (12) 113 (13) 113 (13) Education ≤High school 183 (20) 151 (17) 110 (12) 131 (15) 161 (18) Some college 408 (45) 411 (46) 408 (45) 373 (42) 411 (46) ≥ College 307 (34) 335 (37) 379 (42) 392 (44) 328 (36) Smoking Never 493 (55) 476 (53) 453 (50) 464 (52) 433 (48) Former 307 (34) 319 (36) 329 (37) 326 (36) 334 (37) Current 98 (11) 102 (11) 115 (13) 106 (12) 133 (15) Alcohol use None 498 (55) 429 (48) 427 (47) 382 (43) 383 (43) 0–7 drinks per week 258 (29) 285 (32) 297 (33) 311 (35) 330 (37) >7 drinks per week 138 (15) 174 (19) 163 (18) 197 (22) 178 (20) Physical activity1 51.4 ± 52.0 55.8 ± 57.8 56.4 ± 62.8 60.1 ± 61.3 66.3 ± 64.3 Body mass index (kg/m2) 26.8 ± 4.6 27.2 ± 4.7 27.7 ± 5.0 27.8 ± 5.0 28.9 ± 5.1 Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 127.0 ± 22 125.6 ± 20 125.6 ± 22 123.3 ± 21 124.8 ± 21 Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) 72.0 ± 10 71.8 ± 10 72.3 ± 11 71.1 ± 10 71.6 ± 10 Hypertension medication use 347 (39) 330 (37) 319 (35) 289 (32) 294 (33) Estimated GFR2 79.0 ± 16.2 79.2 ± 15.9 78.8 ± 17.2 79.4 ± 16.1 80.6 ± 16.9 Estimated GFR <60 ml/min/1.73m2 92 (10) 85 (10) 88 (10) 88 (10) 68 (8) Serum phosphorus (mg/dL)3 3.5 ± 0.5 3.5 ± 0.5 3.4 ± 0.5 3.5 ± 0.5 3.4 ± 0.5 Albuminuria (≥30 mg/dL) 77 (9) 63 (7) 94 (10) 70 (8) 64 (7) C-reactive protein (mg/L) 3.6 ± 7.3 3.1 ± 4.5 3.3 ± 5.0 3.6 ± 5.8 3.8 ± 5.4 Total calories (kcal) 949.3 ± 224 1255.6 ± 285 1562.3 ± 360 1918.5 ± 450 2701.5 ± 867 Sodium (mg/day) 1232.4 ± 434 1726.2 ± 571 2184.2 ± 718 2738.8 ± 908 4002.8 ± 1632 Percent calories from protein 15.0 ± 3.8 16.0 ± 3.8 16.2 ± 3.5 16.4 ± 3.3 17.3 ± 3.6 Percent calories from fat 33.9 ± 7.9 33.8 ± 7.2 34.2 ± 6.7 34.6 ± 6.8 35.0 ± 6.5 † All values expressed as mean ± standard deviation or number (perce
867 Sodium (mg/day) 1232.4 ± 434 1726.2 ± 571 2184.2 ± 718 2738.8 ± 908 4002.8 ± 1632 Percent calories from protein 15.0 ± 3.8 16.0 ± 3.8 16.2 ± 3.5 16.4 ± 3.3 17.3 ± 3.6 Percent calories from fat 33.9 ± 7.9 33.8 ± 7.2 34.2 ± 6.7 34.6 ± 6.8 35.0 ± 6.5 † All values expressed as mean ± standard deviation or number (perce nt). 1 Metabolic equivalent task minutes per week of moderate-vigorous physical activity/100. 2 Estimated glomerular filtration rate in ml/min/1.73m2. 3 Serum phosphorus measurements available for a subset of 947 study participants. Table 2 Association of continuous estimated dietary phosphorus intake with left ventricular mass. Model, adjusted for N in model Difference in left ventricular mass (grams)† Per 100 mg greater estimated dietary phosphorus (95% CI) Per 20% greater estimated dietary phosphorus (95% CI) Demographic factors1 4494 0.17 (0.04, 0.30) 0.42 (0.14, 0.70) Add dietary factors2 4494 0.23 (−0.01, 0.46) 0.84 (0.25, 1.43) Add lifestyle factors3 4450 0.25 (0.01, 0.48) 0.99 (0.40, 1.59) Add comorbidities4 4405 0.28 (0.06, 0.50) 1.06 (0.50, 1.62) † All model estimates represent weighted averages by sex. 1 Demographic model adjusted for age, race, height, weight and weight0.5. 2 Dietary factors model adds total dietary calories and dietary sodium. 3 Lifestyle factors model adds smoking, alcohol use, education, and moderate-vigorous physical activity. 4 Comorbidities model adds diabetes status, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.
2 Dietary factors model adds total dietary calories and dietary sodium. 3 Lifestyle factors model adds smoking, alcohol use, education, and moderate-vigorous physical activity. 4 Comorbidities model adds diabetes status, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Table 3 Association of sex-specific dietary phosphorus quintiles with left ventricular mass. Dietary phosphorus quintile Q1 (N=898) Q2 (N=898) Q3 (N=900) Q4 (N=898) Q5 (N=898) Left ventricular mass (g, mean ± SD) 139 ± 39 143 ± 39 146 ± 41 148 ± 39 151 ± 39 Difference in left ventricular mass, grams (95% CI)† Demographic factors1 reference 1.57 (−0.73, 3.88) 2.46 (0.14, 4.79) 2.95 (0.60, 5.29) 3.36 (0.99, 5.72) Add dietary factors2 reference 2.17 (−0.31, 4.64) 3.53 (0.72, 6.35) 4.40 (1.14, 7.66) 5.44 (1.34, 9.53) Add lifestyle factors3 reference 2.43 (−0.04, 4.90) 3.98 (1.16, 6.79) 5.24 (1.98, 8.50) 6.20 (2.11, 10.30) Add comorbidities4 reference 2.66 (0.33, 4.98) 3.91 (1.26, 6.56) 5.64 (2.57, 8.72) 6.13 (2.27, 9.98) † All model estimates represent weighted averages by sex. 1 Demographic model adjusted for age, race, height, weight and weight0.5. 2 Dietary factors model adds total dietary calories and dietary sodium. 3 Lifestyle factors model adds smoking, alcohol use, education, and moderate-vigorous physical activity. 4 Comorbidities model adds diabetes status, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.
2 Dietary factors model adds total dietary calories and dietary sodium. 3 Lifestyle factors model adds smoking, alcohol use, education, and moderate-vigorous physical activity. 4 Comorbidities model adds diabetes status, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Table 4 Association of estimated dietary phosphorus with left ventricular mass by subgroup.
3 Lifestyle factors model adds smoking, alcohol use, education, and moderate-vigorous physical activity. 4 Comorbidities model adds diabetes status, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. Table 4 Association of estimated dietary phosphorus with left ventricular mass by subgroup. Subgroup N Mean LVM (g) ± SD Difference in LVM (g) per 20% greater dietary phosphorus (95% CI)† Overall cohort 4494 145 ± 39 1.06 (0.50, 1.62) Men 2167 169 ± 37 0.59 (−0.49, 1.67) Women 2327 124 ± 27 1.24 (0.58, 1.89) Pre-menopausal women 355 122 ± 25 0.42 (−1.27, 2.11) Post-menopausal women 1,878 124 ± 28 1.38 (0.65, 2.12) Age 45–64 years 2467 147 ± 39 0.97 (0.27, 1.67) Age 65–84 years 1847 142 ± 39 1.22 (0.29, 2.16) White 1820 144 ± 38 0.89 (0.08, 1.71) Black 1074 158 ± 41 0.76 (−0.70, 2.23) Asian 623 124 ± 31 0.98 (−0.18, 2.15) Hispanic 977 148 ± 38 1.55 (0.34, 2.76) Hypertension1 2050 153 ± 41 1.05 (0.12, 1.98) No Hypertension1 2442 138 ± 36 0.91 (0.22, 1.59) Chronic kidney disease 421 142 ± 40 2.01 (0.24, 3.78) No chronic kidney disease 4061 146 ± 39 0.99 (0.40, 1.99) † Except for the covariate representing the subgroup of interest, all models weighed and combined by sex and adjusted for age, race, height, weight and weight0.5, total dietary calories, dietary sodium, smoking, alcohol use, education, moderate-vigorous physical activity, diabetes status, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.
race, height, weight and weight0.5, total dietary calories, dietary sodium, smoking, alcohol use, education, moderate-vigorous physical activity, diabetes status, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein, and estimated glomerular filtration rate. 1 Hypertension models exclude adjustment for systolic blood pressure and anti-hypertensive medication use. Table 5 Association of estimated dietary phosphorus with left ventricular mass within food groups Protein type Processed food type Examples* Proportion dietary phosphorus (mg/day) Difference in LVM (mg)† 95% CI Animal Processed Hamburger Fried chicken 14% (146 mg/day) +102 −736, +939 Animal Unprocessed Eggs Roast chicken 16% (169 mg/day) +82 −614, +777 Dairy Processed Flavored yogurt Ice cream 5% (54 mg/day) −153 −1101, +795 Dairy Unprocessed Milk Cottage cheese 22% (277 mg/day) +219 −150, +437 Vegetable Processed Fried rice Chili 6% (66 mg/day) −19 −526, +488 Vegetable Unprocessed Cold cereal Nuts 11% (118 mg/day) +673 −52, +1398 Non-protein Processed Crackers Soda 9% (96 mg/day) −975 −1983, +33 Non-protein Unprocessed Fruit Beer 17% (164 mg/day) +644 −389, +1676 * The complete categorization of all 120-food frequency questionnaire items is presented in supplemental table 3. † LVM = left ventricular mass Associations per 100 mg greater dietary phosphorus within each food category. N = 4,405 for all models.
Protein type Processed food type Examples* Proportion dietary phosphorus (mg/day) Difference in LVM (mg)† 95% CI Animal Processed Hamburger Fried chicken 14% (146 mg/day) +102 −736, +939 Animal Unprocessed Eggs Roast chicken 16% (169 mg/day) +82 −614, +777 Dairy Processed Flavored yogurt Ice cream 5% (54 mg/day) −153 −1101, +795 Dairy Unprocessed Milk Cottage cheese 22% (277 mg/day) +219 −150, +437 Vegetable Processed Fried rice Chili 6% (66 mg/day) −19 −526, +488 Vegetable Unprocessed Cold cereal Nuts 11% (118 mg/day) +673 −52, +1398 Non-protein Processed Crackers Soda 9% (96 mg/day) −975 −1983, +33 Non-protein Unprocessed Fruit Beer 17% (164 mg/day) +644 −389, +1676 * The complete categorization of all 120-food frequency questionnaire items is presented in supplemental table 3. † LVM = left ventricular mass Associations per 100 mg greater dietary phosphorus within each food category. N = 4,405 for all models. All models weighed and combined by sex and adjusted for age, race, height, weight and weight0.5, total dietary calories, dietary sodium, smoking, alcohol use, education, moderate-vigorous physical activity, diabetes status, systolic blood pressure, anti-hypertensive medication use, urinary albumin to creatinine ratio, C-reactive protein, and estimated glomerular filtration rate.