CCATClinical Analysis Tool
‹ Knowledge base

Browse the corpus

Walk the evidence base by book and chapter — the raw source passages that ground Ask, Differential, and the rest.

1 passage

abstractpubmed· Abstract 2020· item PMID:32115630

Initial experience of robotic anatomical segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. OBJECTIVE: Anatomical segmentectomy has the potential to replace lobectomy as the standard procedure for early stage non-small cell lung cancer. We investigated the safety and feasibility of robotic anatomical segmentectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. METHODS: Overall 20 patients underwent robotic anatomical segmentectomy at Hiroshima University Hospital between January 2014 and January 2018. The clinicopathological characteristics, surgical outcomes, complications and prognosis were analyzed. RESULTS: The median age was 68 (range 42-86) years, and 15 patients were female. Six patients were non-smokers. The most common clinical stage was IA1 (nine patients). Complex segmentectomies were performed in four patients (one right S3 segmentectomy, two right S8 segmentectomies and one left S8 + S9 segmentectomy). The median operation time was 163.5 (range, 114-314) minutes, and the median console time was 104 (range, 60-246) minutes. The median blood loss was 26.5 (range, 5-247) ml. The median resection margin and number of dissected lymph node were 15 (range, 2-60) mm and 5 (range, 1-15), respectively. Although five (25.0%) patients had grade IIIa complications (pleurodesis for prolonged air leakage) and one (5.0%) had a grade IIIb complication (reoperation for prolonged air leakage), no post-operative deaths occurred. The surgical outcomes were comparable with those of anatomical segmentectomy performed under hybrid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery during the same period. CONCLUSION: In our initial experience of robotic anatomical segmentectomy for early stage non-small cell lung cancer, the procedure seems to be safe and feasible.